I will not disavow Dylann Roof.
by Billy Roper
Dylann Roof said that he shot the nine blacks in order to draw attention to the fact that every day in the U.S., blacks rape and murder Whites, and that this grim reality of an ongoing one-sided racial war is either ignored or downplayed by the controlled media. It’s not just that blacks rape and murder Whites, or even that blacks disproportionately rape and murder Whites, it’s that blacks target Whites every day for rape and murder, specifically, for racial reasons. Are you with him so far? Because if you aren’t, you need to read some interracial crime statistics and listen to some rap lyrics, if you don’t want to do the field research to enjoy some diversity by being around them, in a direct context. And, if you’re like most people, regardless of how they might virtue signal to the contrary, you really don’t.
Does the controlled media downplay black victimization of Whites? Observably, yes. Does the controlled media have a liberal bias? Demonstrably, yes. Is it just that left-wingers are drawn to journalism as a career, or that they don’t want to be accused of racism, and potentially lose their jobs, so they bend over backwards to be on-air social justice warriors? Perhaps. But then again, it might also be that the almost universal, and objectively provable, Jewish ownership of the controlled media has been responsible for creating, over the years, a palpable anti-White climate among journalists, too. Either way, the unwillingness of the controlled media to report black crime, especially against Whites, is clear, and it’s more than just the novelty of the unusual ‘man bites dog’ reversal when it’s the other way around at work which makes them gleeful about reporting the rare White on black crime. That, see, fits their agenda. And it was precisely that observed media bias in the wake of the Trayvon Martin shooting which led Dylann to Google “black on White crime”, starting him down a road of shocking discovery.
The shootings happened at a ‘historically black’ church. Such is the hypocritical state of our society that no one blinks at there being ‘historically black’ churches and universities, but people lose their minds at the idea that Whites might wish similar institutions of our own. Blacks can demand racially segregated dorms on college campuses, and get them, but White students cannot have a White Student Union to stand alongside similar organizations for every other race, much less their own living spaces, except when they receive them in a de facto sense when blacks receive theirs. There are black-only scholarships, grants, minority set-asides, hiring preferences and quotas, SAT score bonuses, and even Congressional caucuses. Everyone can continue the list of one-sided affirmative action examples of Black Privilege. But was this black church chosen by Dylann at random? Not at all.
The Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church in Charleston was founded by rebellious slaves including Denmark Vesey, who led a planned slave revolt on June 16th, 1822. Dylann chose the date of his visit to the church because it was the anniversary of Vesey’s terrorist plot. Vesey and his followers planned to kill Whites in Charleston, liberate the slaves, and sail to the black republic of Haiti for refuge. Haiti had experienced a similar black revolution two decades earlier, wherein all of the White inhabitants of the island had been savagely murdered. By some accounts, Vesey’s plan would have involved thousands of slaves in the city and others on plantations miles away. City officials had a militia arrest the plot’s leaders and many suspected followers before the rising could begin. Vesey and over thirty of the chief plotters were executed, but the Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church where the planning meetings of the revolt were held remains. Black churches have always been the centers of radical racial political movements, and have often served not just as meeting houses, but as store-rooms for weapons, as well. This, historically, is why black churches were targeted by the KKK during the 1960s.
Dylann’s website was called “The Last Rhodesian”, a reference to the African nation which is now known as Zimbabwe, now that blacks have overthrown White rule there, confiscated White property, and turned a formerly productive and prosperous nation into a third world cesspool. His respectable knowledge of local, U.S., and world history seems to have largely come through self-education, as does his apprehension, expressed as he sidestepped making excuses or apologies for his actions, that psychiatry is a Jewish invention. After the first day of the sentencing phase of Dylann’s trial, the media was buzzing with a false curiosity about whether or not he will receive the death penalty. As one talking head responded to another’s question about the likely outcome, “Because of the racial hatred involved, the life in prison option isn’t really on the table.” In other words, Dylann will be executed because he is a White young man who struck back against blacks.
If that is the standard, if political motive is the measure of sentencing, then how many black rapists and murderers will face enhanced punishments for purposefully targeting Whites, one wonders? Will the four blacks who kidnapped and tortured a disabled White youth in Chicago, while screaming “f*ck White people”, be sentenced more harshly based on their “racial hatred”? Don’t hold your breath. And even if they do, as Whites are mistakenly calling for it, that would be wrong. Worse, it would be a signal of surrender to the ideal of racial equality. Whites facing racial genocide, begging for the same treatment and protection under the law as nonWhites, shows everyone that our working within the system and trying to be conservative and vote our way out of this demographic nightmare unfolding hasn’t worked for our interests. We’ve fallen far past the point where it can. The United States of America was founded specifically of, by, and for Whites, and now we’ve retreated so far that we feel heroic when we argue for having the same rights as our obsolete farm machinery. Keep voting.
“White America is complicit: Charleston, Dylann Roof, and the country’s real race war” Salon shrieks, and controlled media outlets all over the country follow their lead, in a panic. Covering the trial, self-described journalists seem more worried about what he might say in his closing statements, and how they can keep people from hearing it, than either his life, or indeed, the nine lives whose loss is being adjudicated.
The defendant, though, seems to be the calmest person is the courtroom, despite his young age. He is willing to die, rather than ask for forgiveness, or express remorse, or claim mental illness. He is willing to die, in order to not weaken the cause for which he believes he took action. His family and friends have all abandoned and disavowed him. There hasn’t been a single black thug in history who hasn’t had some weeping mammajamma mewling about how they was a good boy who dindu nuffin, no matter what they do, and a mob of lower primates willing to march and protest and loot and pillage in their name. Dylann has no one. And still, he is willing to die for his beliefs, and however young he may be, to own his actions like a man. I won’t disavow that.
“I have no choice,” his manifesto reads. “I am not in the position to, alone, go into the ghetto and fight. I chose Charleston because it is the most historic city in my state, and at one time had the highest ratio of blacks to Whites in the country. We have no skinheads, no real KKK, no one doing anything but talking on the internet. Well someone has to have the bravery to take it to the real world, and I guess that has to be me.”