Andrew Anglin’s Double Standards
by Billy Roper
This limited public statement concerning Andrew Anglin of The Daily Stormer should settle the flurry of controversy expressed in the deluge of e-mails I woke up to this morning. Yes, Andrew Anglin DID say that in his opinion no harm came from White men having sex with nonWhites. The entire discussion can be followed at Stormfront, HERE.
Quotes of his from last night’s conversation which we had:
“Women are the property of men, and they exist to serve men, to create children for men.“
“If a non-white has sex with a white woman, we are being collectively robbed of our vessels of reproduction. A man having sex with a non-white is just cucking another race’s men.”
“What are the effects of a white man having sex with a non-white woman? In real terms, what does it do?
Who is “betrayed” by this?
“Betrayal” implies severe harm – how is any white person harmed if some guy sport-bangs a non-white? What is the process through which this happens?”
My response: I believe that our racial identity and our gender identity are the only two things we’re born with which aren’t subject to some degree of environmental influence, so disloyalty to either, i.e., race mixing or homosexuality, are the two greatest, and for me unforgivable, violations of nature’s and God’s law.
White women are betrayed, dishonored, and disrespected by White men having sex with nonWhite women. White children, who learn from the examples they witness, are betrayed by White men having sex with nonWhite women, as that devalues the worth and value of their mothers and sisters and other White women in their eyes. Our race is betrayed by White men having sex with nonWhite women, because it lowers us to the same level as animals, engaging in virtual beastiality. To that end, a White man betrays himself, and all of his ancestors, when he has sex with a nonWhite woman.
But those who are guilty of racial treason can’t undo what they’ve done, and there’s no point in arguing with them about it. I just wanted to nail him down, after all the waffling and weaselling, and get it clearly stated. Andrew Anglin doesn’t see any harm in White men having sex with nonWhite women.
I’m sure that Andrew is just as glad to have a very clear line drawn between his view and mine, as I am.
In closing, I know that saying that “once you’ve gone black, or yellow, we don’t want you back”, will exclude some people, and that’s precisely the point. Some people should be excluded. I don’t think those standards are too exacting, and I think we should hold both genders to them, equally.
If the only difference between someone who is acceptable and someone who isn’t, is whether the rubber broke or their swimmers were healthy, or not, then we don’t stand for much.
But, if you’d be fine marrying a White girl who’d spent years sport-screwing black bucks for fun, if she never got pregnant by one, then that’s up to you.
Is my worldview harsh and exclusive and mean and intolerant? Probably so.
I stand by my principles. Lord knows, somebody has to.
Latest posts by Pastor Paul R. Mullet (see all)
- THE KEYS TO UNDERSTANDING THE HOLY SCRIPTURES - May 6, 2017
- Divine Truth Radio - May 4, 2017
- Trachtenberg: As Jewish community faces challenges, Holocaust-denying professor has no place at NU - May 2, 2017